Wiliams Divorce & Family Law Logo

CAN WE HELP?Request your free 30 minute consultOR CALL US AT 651-332-7650

  • Home
  • Our Staff
    • Attorney Gerald O. Williams
    • Paralegal Jocelyn Daul
  • Practice Areas
    • Alimony
    • Child Custody
    • Child Support
    • Collaborative Divorce
    • Divorce
    • International Custody
    • Interstate Custody
    • LGBTQIA+ Divorce & Custody
    • Mediation
  • Billing
    • Billing FAQ
    • Flat Fee Divorce
  • Blog
  • Clients
    • Making Payments
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Directions to Williams Divorce and Family Law
    • Resources
    • Privacy Policy

Moving Out of State With the Children

Posted by Gerald Williams 
· April 27, 2009 
· No Comments

When one parent wants to move out of state, with the children, a dispute often erupts because of the other parent's opposition to such a big change for the kids.  In most states, if a parent wants to move the residence of the children to another state, the burden of proving the merits of the move to the court lies with the parenting desiring to move. 

Until recently, Minnesota was in the minority: making the non-moving parent prove that the move is a BAD idea.  Legislation in 2006 brought Minnesota in line with the majority of jurisdictions, placing the burden of proof on the parent petitioning to change the children's state of residence. 

The fact is, in many cases, the difference in the laws does not make a difference in the outcome of the case.  Many proposed moves would be approved by the court, regardless of which parent has the burden of proof.  Conversely, many proposed moves would be denied, either way.  However, if each parent has a solid basis for their position on the issue, and the case is a "close call," the change in law can have an impact on whether or not the children are allowed to move.  

When parenting neutrals are appointed to make recommendations on out-of-state moves, they are required to base their recommendations on what is in the child's best interests (not on what might be in the best interests of one of the parents).  Under the previous law, the parenting neutrals would consider primarily whether there were drawbacks to the move and whether the purpose of the move was to interfere with the other parent's relationship with the child.  Now, the focus is on whether the move is compelling enough, from the standpoint of the child, to be worth the upheaval involved in the move.  

Another recent development is the court order that makes a parent's custody conditional on the parent remaining in Minnesota.  A parent is free to move where they please, but that does not go for the child too.  There is a growing incidence of the court awarding custody of the children to one of the parents, subject to the provision that if that parent decides to move out of Minnesota, custody would be transferred to the parent remaining in Minnesota.  
No Comments
Categories : Child Custody
Previous Post →
← Next Post

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Recent Posts

  • Child Support and Alimony Arrears
  • Spousal Maintenance Payments Are Not Deductible From Taxable Income
  • Interesting Perspective on Divorce, Mediation and Collaborative Law
  • Independence of Provisions for Parenting Time and Child Support
  • Name Change in Divorce

Categories

  • Alimony / Spousal Maintenance (8)
  • Child Custody (42)
  • Child Support (21)
  • Co-parenting (1)
  • Court of Appeals (2)
  • Divorce (45)
  • Financial Issues (2)
  • General Family Law (53)
  • Guardian ad litem (6)
  • Interstate issues (2)
  • LGBTQIA Divorce (5)
  • Mediation (5)
  • Mental Health (3)
  • Parenting Plans (1)
  • Parenting Time (17)
  • Parenting time expeditor (3)
  • Uncategorized (37)
  • Uncontested Divorce (6)
Copyright © 2025 Williams Divorce & Family Law All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy

The content of this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. To establish an attorney-client relationship with Williams Divorce & Family Law requires a retainer agreement signed by you and attorney Gerald O. Williams.

Minnesota divorce attorney, Gerald O. Williams, represents clients in divorce and family law primarily in the communities of Woodbury, St. Paul, Minneapolis, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Cottage Grove, Maplewood, Oakdale, Lake Elmo, and Stillwater, as well as the greater seven county metro area including Washington, Ramsey, Hennepin, Dakota, Anoka, Scott, and Carver.