Wiliams Divorce & Family Law Logo

CAN WE HELP?Request your free 30 minute consultOR CALL US AT 651-332-7650

  • Home
  • Our Staff
    • Attorney Gerald O. Williams
    • Paralegal Jocelyn Daul
  • Practice Areas
    • Alimony
    • Child Custody
    • Child Support
    • Collaborative Divorce
    • Divorce
    • International Custody
    • Interstate Custody
    • LGBTQIA+ Divorce & Custody
    • Mediation
  • Billing
    • Billing FAQ
    • Flat Fee Divorce
  • Blog
  • Clients
    • Making Payments
  • About Us
    • Contact Us
    • Directions to Williams Divorce and Family Law
    • Resources
    • Privacy Policy

Archive for Financial Issues

Marital Interests in Property Titled in One Spouse’s Name

Posted by Gerald Williams 
· April 27, 2020 
· No Comments

The premise of this blog post is a simple one. When you are getting divorced, you and your spouse are splitting assets, including assets that have only one party’s name on the title. That includes the house, cars, recreational vehicles, and other property items. If you are married, it does not really matter that the asset is in your name alone.

This is because all property is presumed to be marital unless one can make a valid non-marital claim to the property item. Non-marital claims include those tied to assets owned before the marriage, assets inherited from family members, or assets acquired after the parties stopped living together as spouses. If the property is titled in one spouse’s name, but that spouse does not have a valid non-marital claim to the asset, then the asset is considered marital, and must be included in the property division.

If the house is titled only in one spouse’s name, both spouses have an interest in the house, and one spouse will have to buy out the interest of the other spouse. It might even be that the titled spouse buys out the interest of the other, non-titled spouse, in which case the title will need to be placed into the name of the non-titled spouse after the divorce process is complete.

This principle applies to debts as well. If one spouse was left off of the mortgage because they had credit problems, that does not absolve that spouse of co-responsibility to repay the mortgage debt.

As for assets that are held jointly, but to which one spouse has a non-marital claim, this principle does apply conversely as well. If one party has a non-marital claim to an asset for which title is held jointly, the joint title (on its own) does not defeat the non-marital claim. There are many instances when one party will oppose a non-marital claim by asserting that the asset is held in joint names. How title is held is not the most important factor; the most important factor is whether the asset is a product of joint efforts (literally or figuratively) as opposed to being traced to before the marriage, to an inheritance, or facts that show an absence of marital funds or efforts.

No Comments
Categories : Divorce, Financial Issues

Neutral Vocational Evaluations

Posted by Gerald Williams 
· March 6, 2020 
· No Comments

When a couple is divorcing, issues may arise regarding the present earnings, past earnings, future earnings or potential earnings of one or both spouses. This happens most commonly when one party is seeking spousal maintenance (a/k/a alimony), and the other party believes the requesting party is under-employed. That term (under-employed) refers to (a) working less than full-time and/or (b) foregoing the opportunity for higher level earnings. In most cases, the dispute can be resolved by negotiating the issue in conjunction with other financial issues, such as retirement assets or house equity – oftentimes with a mediator.

But if the parties need a vocational expert to weigh in on the issue, most commonly it is because the spouse who would pay spousal maintenance would like to show how much higher the requesting spouse’s income could be. This spouse might be tempted to hire an expert to focus on the potential income and estimate as high as possible. That would require the requesting spouse to hire a competing expert to focus on the realities of the job market and the obstacles and limitations that stand in the way of maximum earnings. If the parties litigate the issue in family court, then the judge is presented with two extremes, neither of which is likely the fair answer to the question. Nor is it likely to be a fair result for the court to simply average the opinions of the two experts. Nor is the court in the best-informed position hearing from experts advocating for one “side” of the legal dispute.

If the parties agree to enlist a neutral vocational expert, they will likely share the cost of the expert’s work (which saves each party half of what they would likely spend on their own experts), and the work product will be a better way to provide the court with an informed record on which to make a decision. Moreover, the parties may avoid the need to let the court decide the issue altogether, if the parties are able to agree that the neutral expert’s opinion is a satisfactory middle ground.

No Comments
Categories : Financial Issues

Recent Posts

  • Child Support and Alimony Arrears
  • Spousal Maintenance Payments Are Not Deductible From Taxable Income
  • Interesting Perspective on Divorce, Mediation and Collaborative Law
  • Independence of Provisions for Parenting Time and Child Support
  • Name Change in Divorce

Categories

  • Alimony / Spousal Maintenance (8)
  • Child Custody (42)
  • Child Support (21)
  • Co-parenting (1)
  • Court of Appeals (2)
  • Divorce (45)
  • Financial Issues (2)
  • General Family Law (53)
  • Guardian ad litem (6)
  • Interstate issues (2)
  • LGBTQIA Divorce (5)
  • Mediation (5)
  • Mental Health (3)
  • Parenting Plans (1)
  • Parenting Time (17)
  • Parenting time expeditor (3)
  • Uncategorized (37)
  • Uncontested Divorce (6)
Copyright © 2025 Williams Divorce & Family Law All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy

The content of this website is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or an attorney-client relationship. To establish an attorney-client relationship with Williams Divorce & Family Law requires a retainer agreement signed by you and attorney Gerald O. Williams.

Minnesota divorce attorney, Gerald O. Williams, represents clients in divorce and family law primarily in the communities of Woodbury, St. Paul, Minneapolis, Eagan, Inver Grove Heights, Cottage Grove, Maplewood, Oakdale, Lake Elmo, and Stillwater, as well as the greater seven county metro area including Washington, Ramsey, Hennepin, Dakota, Anoka, Scott, and Carver.